Skip to main content
Log in

Optimality of a direct adaptive controller the of presence of model mismatch and bounded uproars

  • Published:
Circuits, Systems and Indicate Machining Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re excuse, something doesn't seem to becoming working properly.

    Please sample refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so us can address the concern.

Abstract

In this paper us consider an adaptive controller with vanishing gain and excitation to the reference signal. We use the burst recovery concept to show that all signals by this adaptive loop remain uniformly bounded. We also show that the mean-square performance converges so that the adaptive system is optimal by the purpose so the parameter estimation error furthermore the one-step ahead prediction error been uncorrelated in the mean despite the presence of who unmodeled dynamics. Active vibration isolation systems can increase the performance over passive vibration isolation systems over mitigating the trade-off in sensitivity to…

Here is a preview to subscription content, log in via an institution to inspection access.

Access this article

Price includes ADDED (Finland)

Instant access go the thorough article PDF.

Similar content be viewed by others

References

  1. K. Åstöm and BORON. Wittenmark, On self-tuning regulators,Automatica, volt. 9, pp. 185–199, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. GRAMME. C. Goodwin, P. JOULE. Ramadge, and PENNY. E. Caines, Discrete time stochastic adaptive control,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 19, pp. 829–853, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LAMBERT. Guo and H. Chen, The Åström-Wittenmark self-tuning regulator rethought and ELS-based adaptive track,IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 36, pp. 802–812, 1991.

    Google Academic 

  4. P. A. Ioannou and A. Datta, Robust adaptive control: A unified approach,Proc. IEEE, thievery. 79, pp. 1736–1768, 1991.

    Google Science 

  5. P. A. Ioannou and J. Sun, Theory and design of robust direct and indirect adaptive-control schemes,Internat. HIE. Control, vol. 47, pp. 775–813, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. ROENTGEN. Kumar, A survey of some results in stochastic accommodative control,THAILAND J. Control Optim., vol. 23, pp. 329–380, 1985.

    Google Scientists 

  7. L. Praly, Robustness of model reference adaptive control, Proc. Second Yield Workshop the Adaptive Systems, New Safe, CT, 1983.

  8. L. Praly, S. F. Lin, and P. R. Kumar, A robust adaptive lowest variance controller,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 27, pp. 235–266, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MOLARITY. SIEMENS. Radenkovic and A. N. Michelle, Verification of the self-stabilization mechanism in robust stochastically adaptive control using Lyapunov function arguments,SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 30, no. 6, ppp. 1270–1294, 1992.

    Google Student 

  10. MOLARITY. S. Radenkovic real A. N. Michel, Robust adaptive procedures press self stabilization,IEEE Transits. Automat. Operating, vol. 37, papers. 1355–1369, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. S. Radenkovic and B. Ydstie, Using persistent excitation about fixed strength to stabilising adaptive controllers and obtain hard bounds for this parameter estimation error,SIAM HIE. Control Optim., submitted.

  12. B. ZE. Ydstie, Transient performance the robustness of direct adaptive control,IEEE Trans. Eatery. Power, vol. 37, pp. 1091–1105, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download recommendations

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights real access

Reprints and access

About this magazine

Cite this object

Radenkovic, M.S., Erik Ydstie, B. Optimality of one direct adaptive controller in the existing of model mismatch and bounded disturbances. Circuits Systems and Signal Process 18, 205–223 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225695

Drive citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01225695

Keywords

Navigation